1. 16:41 27th Dec 2011

    Notes: 12

    Reblogged from meta-maieutics

    Tags: mbtijcf

    image: Download

    meta-maieutics: elijahlain: freckledblondie: #elijahlain Guilty as charged. :P hmm… I don’t think I would actually consider this to be an “INTJ” trait (mostly because the idea of an “INTJ” trait is pretty laughable in itself, also because of the reason I will explain below”. Although I know that OBVIOUSLY this is meant to be humourous but functionally, it just doesn’t work: “Spelling Nazism” is way more indicative of Si than Ni, because Ni dominance (or anyone on the Ni/Se dichotomy, really), would be generally indifferent to such an insignificant error, providing that the message was still Je communicated.  This cartoon is basically just comically hyperbolizing the archetype of a person so dedicated to insignificant details that it eclipses their view of larger issues. That person is an ISTJ, maybe an ESTJ. See also: Temperance Brennan (from Bones), Sheldon Cooper (Big Bang Theory) and Lord Voldemort… All of these people are ISTJs, Tumblr… When I saw the strip, I interpreted it not only as a representation of emotional detachment, but also an illustration of the INTJs hallmark independence and respect for individual autonomy. The assumed INTJ character did not question the personal decision of the other character out of respect for the individual’s capacity to make a decision, and instead moved to the next thing in line: effective execution of plan. (Based out of a “results” paradigm.) But with that said, I think your analysis better addressed the actual idea the strip was getting at. I cede to your superior knowledge of JCF! So I understand S functions are often associated with details and facts as opposed to overarching ideas. However, couldn’t the Ti drive for precision and clarity also explain “spelling nazism”? Or would that still be dependent on which percieving function that directed it? (ie Ti with S focuses on precision in details, Ti with N focuses on precision of ideas?) Just tryin’ to learn more.

    meta-maieutics:

    elijahlain:

    freckledblondie:

    #elijahlain

    Guilty as charged. :P

    hmm… I don’t think I would actually consider this to be an “INTJ” trait (mostly because the idea of an “INTJ” trait is pretty laughable in itself, also because of the reason I will explain below”.

    Although I know that OBVIOUSLY this is meant to be humourous but functionally, it just doesn’t work:

    “Spelling Nazism” is way more indicative of Si than Ni, because Ni dominance (or anyone on the Ni/Se dichotomy, really), would be generally indifferent to such an insignificant error, providing that the message was still Je communicated.

     This cartoon is basically just comically hyperbolizing the archetype of a person so dedicated to insignificant details that it eclipses their view of larger issues. That person is an ISTJ, maybe an ESTJ.

    See also: Temperance Brennan (from Bones), Sheldon Cooper (Big Bang Theory) and Lord Voldemort…

    All of these people are ISTJs, Tumblr…

    When I saw the strip, I interpreted it not only as a representation of emotional detachment, but also an illustration of the INTJs hallmark independence and respect for individual autonomy. The assumed INTJ character did not question the personal decision of the other character out of respect for the individual’s capacity to make a decision, and instead moved to the next thing in line: effective execution of plan. (Based out of a “results” paradigm.)

    But with that said, I think your analysis better addressed the actual idea the strip was getting at. I cede to your superior knowledge of JCF!

    So I understand S functions are often associated with details and facts as opposed to overarching ideas. However, couldn’t the Ti drive for precision and clarity also explain “spelling nazism”? Or would that still be dependent on which percieving function that directed it? (ie Ti with S focuses on precision in details, Ti with N focuses on precision of ideas?)

    Just tryin’ to learn more.

     

  2. 01:24 15th Dec 2011

    Notes: 107944

    Reblogged from enfpanorama

    Tags: NproblemsMBTIJCFINTJ

    image: Download

    enfpanorama: theideathief: This is what happens when an N dom doesn’t ground themselves with a Je function. Learn teh conventions, plais.  This is what happens whenever I attempt to lie down and sleep. This is PRECISELY what happens to me when I get involved in a deep discussion or debate. In an instance, my Ni will bombard my conscious with a rapid stream of concurrent and sub points, which leads to a temporary, moments-long paralysis as I sift through the new material. These instances often culminate in an overexplanation or an inarticulation. If my point ISN’T lost, it is certainly delivered suboptimally. I’ve got to train my Te ruthlessly prioritize my points. Less, in the case of an dominant N, is more.

    enfpanorama:

    theideathief:

    This is what happens when an N dom doesn’t ground themselves with a Je function. Learn teh conventions, plais. 

    This is what happens whenever I attempt to lie down and sleep.

    This is PRECISELY what happens to me when I get involved in a deep discussion or debate. In an instance, my Ni will bombard my conscious with a rapid stream of concurrent and sub points, which leads to a temporary, moments-long paralysis as I sift through the new material. These instances often culminate in an overexplanation or an inarticulation. If my point ISN’T lost, it is certainly delivered suboptimally. I’ve got to train my Te ruthlessly prioritize my points. Less, in the case of an dominant N, is more.

    (Source: fuckiminmy20s)